Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
attackoftheflapjack
Labels:
animation,
art,
bruce price,
lauren mae cales,
liz greeen,
lol,
rianna brown,
rotoscope,
video,
what,
zach reini
Monday, December 20, 2010
Saturday, December 18, 2010
Thursday, December 9, 2010
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Friday, November 12, 2010
dinoaur
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
He has saved you from the redundancy and tedium of conventional recycling and skipped all the erroneous steps - plastic, returned to its original jurrasic form.
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
He has saved you from the redundancy and tedium of conventional recycling and skipped all the erroneous steps - plastic, returned to its original jurrasic form.
Labels:
animals,
art,
experimental,
liz greeen,
lol,
plastics,
science
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Saturday, November 6, 2010
human/flavors
Sunday, October 24, 2010
Artist Notebook
Today, I moved all of my "artist notebook" entries to their own blog.
Artist Notebook.
I think this works much better!
Artist Notebook.
I think this works much better!
Thursday, September 23, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
Sunday, August 29, 2010
Thursday, August 26, 2010
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Brain Pixel
brain pixel from liz greeen on Vimeo.
My final video work of the last two semesters - soon, more! Making these is really slow.
Some credits - the whale and chicken rotoscopy is done from stock footage from Getty and the cat is from footage by Dmitrius K Obergfel. This was silent up until Stephan Herrera awesomely worked together a soundtrack for it - I think the entire mood of the piece is changed and improved by this, and honestly I would never have considered it finished without his hard work.
Labels:
animals,
animation,
experimental,
liz greeen,
rmcad,
rotoscope,
stephan herrera,
video
Saturday, July 24, 2010
Don't you know?
Haha. Heh.
I feel like it's redundant to explain text-based art, but maybe the sarcasm here isn't exactly obvious.
Working at Whole Foods, especially, I am growingly aware of how organics and recycling are new forms of conspicuous consumption. I feel that in a way, the eco-consciesness movement has lost a lot of heart, or more specifically, lost a lot of direction. The green movement can do a lot to better the world, indeed, but it realistically has become an extension of the market instead of a pragmatic solution to the very real problem of global pollution (plastics most especially).
Point being - the world will not be saved by artists ironing together plastic bags to make art, or recycling plastic cups, nor by buying new "green" reusable objects, or buying anything, really. Sustainability is not achievable through MORE consumption - a paradigm shift needs to take place in which individuals are aware of how to make what they need in order to live, so as to avoid the unnecessary production of useless disposable junk.
Thursday, July 15, 2010
Sunday, July 11, 2010
artist assisting
Been working with John Mcenroe to fill ten thousand glass tubes with polyeurathane resin for an installation by Donald Lipski.
It has been pretty fucking awesome.
Labels:
art,
contemporary,
liz greeen,
plastics,
science
Monday, June 21, 2010
Masahiro Mori
After seeing this graph a few years ago [thanks James!] I began to pay more attention to the level of comfort people feel around different kinds of figure-based art. Seeing Kiki Smith's Lilith at the sf moma last summer made it clear to me that seeing a life sized figure in person has an entirely different visceral impact than seeing it in photographs.
The uncanny valley graph, described by Masahiro Mori, illustrates the phenomenon of being creeped out by robots and other humanlike objects. This something that I have since been really interesting in exploiting. His book, the Buddha in the Robot, has subsequently blown my mind.
This particular page made me think pretty hard about what I'm planning on doing with an art degree. In the last year, I have focused mostly on building experimental cameras and figuring out the slow process of digital rotoscoping. This has been fun and rewarding. I have learned a lot about photography and animation, but it has been slow and hasn't ended with an incredible quantity of work. In short, building my own art implements has involved a lot of failures and a lot of wondering what the point is. I guess realistically, the processes I enjoy for making images aren't totally congruent with 'gallery art' - for a while this was a bit distressing [because that is what I'm going to school for, pretty much] but after reading Mori's ideas, I feel like this kind of art is really necessary in today's art world. The idea that our work will outlive us! In a way this is a goal and a fear of many artists. We all know the story of the artist who lived his whole life completely unrecognized, gaining appreciation only after death. The idea that the engineer or inventor could have the explicit goal of creating things purely to benefit future generations is so admirable - I wonder if Leonardo da Vinci would have ever thought that his unfinished inventions would be built centuries later on television.
Here - an example. This is me using my scanner camera, comprised of a shopping cart, pre-y2k computer, scanner, and brownie camera body. This image is a bit of a reference to Joel Peter Witkin, who I'd just met, and Sally Mann, who is a badass for using such cool big old cameras and doing wet plate photography.
Here are a few images from the scannercamera. There are quite a few, but these show some of the more interesting effects of the process..
Very few colors make it through the scan. These were all taken in color more, but appear mostly monochrome/grayscale.
Motion is distorted as the exposure takes place from one side of the picture to the other - as opposed to all at once, as with a traditional camera. Also the white blur in the center is an area of intense overexposure. This is the opposite of photo paper, interestingly enough, in that too much light on paper creates black in stead of white. This may well mean that the scannercamera image is black by default.
The uncanny valley graph, described by Masahiro Mori, illustrates the phenomenon of being creeped out by robots and other humanlike objects. This something that I have since been really interesting in exploiting. His book, the Buddha in the Robot, has subsequently blown my mind.
This particular page made me think pretty hard about what I'm planning on doing with an art degree. In the last year, I have focused mostly on building experimental cameras and figuring out the slow process of digital rotoscoping. This has been fun and rewarding. I have learned a lot about photography and animation, but it has been slow and hasn't ended with an incredible quantity of work. In short, building my own art implements has involved a lot of failures and a lot of wondering what the point is. I guess realistically, the processes I enjoy for making images aren't totally congruent with 'gallery art' - for a while this was a bit distressing [because that is what I'm going to school for, pretty much] but after reading Mori's ideas, I feel like this kind of art is really necessary in today's art world. The idea that our work will outlive us! In a way this is a goal and a fear of many artists. We all know the story of the artist who lived his whole life completely unrecognized, gaining appreciation only after death. The idea that the engineer or inventor could have the explicit goal of creating things purely to benefit future generations is so admirable - I wonder if Leonardo da Vinci would have ever thought that his unfinished inventions would be built centuries later on television.
Here - an example. This is me using my scanner camera, comprised of a shopping cart, pre-y2k computer, scanner, and brownie camera body. This image is a bit of a reference to Joel Peter Witkin, who I'd just met, and Sally Mann, who is a badass for using such cool big old cameras and doing wet plate photography.
Here are a few images from the scannercamera. There are quite a few, but these show some of the more interesting effects of the process..
Very few colors make it through the scan. These were all taken in color more, but appear mostly monochrome/grayscale.
Motion is distorted as the exposure takes place from one side of the picture to the other - as opposed to all at once, as with a traditional camera. Also the white blur in the center is an area of intense overexposure. This is the opposite of photo paper, interestingly enough, in that too much light on paper creates black in stead of white. This may well mean that the scannercamera image is black by default.
Labels:
art,
artist notebook,
contemporary,
philosophy,
science,
uncanny valley
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)